Everything Hertz

116: In my opinion

Informações:

Sinopsis

Dan and James chat about a recent twitter discussion on open science funding and the benefits of Editors sharing their opinions online. James also shares three project proposals that he thinks deserves funding, which Dan ranks. Other stuff... The Twitter thread (https://twitter.com/tage_rai/status/1304985745157914624?s=20) from Tage Rai on conflicts of interest in funding on science The Raytheon Amphitheater (http://www.northeastern.edu/egan/raytheon.html) at Northeastern University How Nature Human Behavior evaluates your mansucripts (https://rdcu.be/b7otB), from episode 105 (https://everythinghertz.com/105). Good and bad experiences with Frontiers journals A contract (https://osf.io/5ey8g/) for getting paid for reviews Get access to our Patreon newsletter (https://www.patreon.com/hertzpodcast) The peer-review process (https://reviewer.elifesciences.org/reviewer-guide/review-process) at eLife James' three grant proposal ideas The taxi story (https://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/i/21LV4B/topp-professor-tok-ta